These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 22272730

  • 1. A double-blind, randomized, prospective study of epidural steroid injection vs. the mild® procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Brown LL.
    Pain Pract; 2012 Jun; 12(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 22272730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.
    Benyamin RM, Staats PS.
    Pain Physician; 2015 Jun; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N, Vallejo R, Coleman MH, Benyamin RM.
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I.
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR, Kim CK, Bowman RG, Ranson MT, Yee BS.
    Pain Physician; 2012 May; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis.
    Botwin K, Brown LA, Fishman M, Rao S.
    Pain Physician; 2007 Jul; 10(4):547-58. PubMed ID: 17660853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
    Staats PS, Benyamin RM, MiDAS ENCORE Investigators.
    Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Results of 2-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in central spinal stenosis.
    Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Fellows B.
    Pain Physician; 2012 Feb; 15(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 22996849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
    Mekhail N, Costandi S, Abraham B, Samuel SW.
    Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroids for the treatment of subacute lumbar radicular pain: a randomized, blinded, prospective outcome study.
    Gharibo CG, Varlotta GP, Rhame EE, Liu EC, Bendo JA, Perloff MD.
    Pain Physician; 2011 Jul; 14(6):499-511. PubMed ID: 22086091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Park CH, Lee SH, Jung JY.
    Pain Physician; 2011 Jul; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mild procedure: single-site prospective IRB study.
    Basu S.
    Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21926907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection via a preganglionic approach for lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar discogenic pain with radiculopathy.
    Kabatas S, Cansever T, Yilmaz C, Kocyigit OI, Coskun E, Demircay E, Akar A, Caner H.
    Neurol India; 2010 Jul; 58(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 20508344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Lateral parasagittal versus midline interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection for management of low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain: a double-blind, randomized study.
    Ghai B, Vadaje KS, Wig J, Dhillon MS.
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 23632053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
    Pryzbylkowski P, Bux A, Chandwani K, Khemlani V, Puri S, Rosenberg J, Sukumaran H.
    Pain Manag; 2022 Mar; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections with or without steroids in managing pain of lumbar spinal stenosis: one-year results of randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial.
    Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Fellows B.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):226-34. PubMed ID: 22652990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. mild Interlaminar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: procedure description and case series with 1-year follow-up.
    Wong WH.
    Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 22673487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Understanding whether chronic lower back pain patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from multiple epidural steroid injections prior to the mild® Procedure.
    Pryzbylkowski P, Bux A, Chandwani K, Khemlani V, Puri S, Rosenberg J, Sukumaran H.
    Pain Manag; 2022 Apr; 12(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 34751594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of steroid and nonsteroid caudal epidural injections for low back pain and sciatica: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Sayegh FE, Kenanidis EI, Papavasiliou KA, Potoupnis ME, Kirkos JM, Kapetanos GA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun 15; 34(14):1441-7. PubMed ID: 19525834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Value of the magnetic resonance imaging in patients with painful lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) undergoing lumbar epidural steroid injections.
    Kapural L, Mekhail N, Bena J, McLain R, Tetzlaff J, Kapural M, Mekhail M, Polk S.
    Clin J Pain; 2007 Sep 15; 23(7):571-5. PubMed ID: 17710006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.