These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 22280599

  • 1. Spatial release from speech-on-speech masking in the median sagittal plane.
    Martin RL, McAnally KI, Bolia RS, Eberle G, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):378-85. PubMed ID: 22280599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
    Wu X, Wang C, Chen J, Qu H, Li W, Wu Y, Schneider BA, Li L.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY.
    PLoS One; 2012 Jan; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B, Verhey JL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y, Huang Q, Chen X, Qu T, Wu X, Li L.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.
    Bremen P, Middlebrooks JC.
    PLoS One; 2013 Feb; 8(3):e59815. PubMed ID: 23527271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Binaural release from informational masking in a speech identification task.
    Gallun FJ, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1614-25. PubMed ID: 16240821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences.
    Abouchacra KS, Besing J, Koehnke J, Letowski T.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech-in-noise perception deficit in adults with dyslexia: effects of background type and listening configuration.
    Dole M, Hoen M, Meunier F.
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1543-52. PubMed ID: 22445915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Precedence-based speech segregation in a virtual auditory environment.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3241-51. PubMed ID: 16334903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K, Carlile S, Alais D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M, Jelfs S, Culling JF, Watkins AJ, Raimond AP, Makin SJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
    Carlile S, Corkhill C.
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar 02; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Discriminating spatialised speech in complex environments in multiple sclerosis.
    Iva P, Martin R, Fielding J, Clough M, White O, Godic B, van der Walt A, Rajan R.
    Cortex; 2023 Feb 02; 159():217-232. PubMed ID: 36640621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 02; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.