These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 22280614

  • 1. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G, Gaubitch N, Brookes M, Huckvale M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired.
    Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22501075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of white noise on Callsign Acquisition Test and Modified Rhyme Test scores.
    Blue-Terry M, Letowski T.
    Ergonomics; 2011 Feb; 54(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21294011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The design and testing of a noise reduction algorithm based on spectral subtraction.
    Elberling C, Ludvigsen C, Keidser G.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():39-49. PubMed ID: 8153563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
    Wójcicki KK, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2904-13. PubMed ID: 22501068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.