These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
342 related items for PubMed ID: 2228588
21. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly. Glover JJ. J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan. Weir RF, Gostin L. JAMA; 1990 Oct 10; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions. Brodeur D. Health Prog; 1990 Oct 10; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The long dying of Nancy Cruzan. Annas GJ. Law Med Health Care; 1991 Oct 10; 19(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 1910131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J, Avila D. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991 Jan 10; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health. Barton RS. Issues Law Med; 1991 Jan 10; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al. Issues Law Med; 1990 Jan 10; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ, Arnold B, Aroskar M, Battin P, Bartels D, Beauchamp T, Brock D, Buchanan A, Caplan A, Cohen C. N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep 06; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan. Rouse F. Med Staff Couns; 1991 Sep 06; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH, Hogue EE. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991 Sep 06; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W. J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug 06; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Cruzan decision and medical practice. Thomasma DC. Arch Intern Med; 1991 May 06; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]