These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


532 related items for PubMed ID: 22294208

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets.
    Cao K, Sucosky P.
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 27138991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Sun L, Chandra S, Sucosky P.
    PLoS One; 2012 Mar; 7(10):e48843. PubMed ID: 23119099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Steady flow hemodynamic and energy loss measurements in normal and simulated calcified tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
    Seaman C, Akingba AG, Sucosky P.
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24474392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-dimensional macro-scale assessment of regional and temporal wall shear stress characteristics on aortic valve leaflets.
    Cao K, Bukač M, Sucosky P.
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Apr; 19(6):603-13. PubMed ID: 26155915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry.
    Saikrishnan N, Yap CH, Milligan NC, Vasilyev NV, Yoganathan AP.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 40(8):1760-75. PubMed ID: 22318396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis.
    Weinberg EJ, Kaazempur Mofrad MR.
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec 05; 41(16):3482-7. PubMed ID: 18996528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.
    Viscardi F, Vergara C, Antiga L, Merelli S, Veneziani A, Puppini G, Faggian G, Mazzucco A, Luciani GB.
    Artif Organs; 2010 Dec 05; 34(12):1114-20. PubMed ID: 20618222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A computational analysis of potential aortic dilation induced by the hemodynamic effects of bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes.
    Hou Q, Tao K, Du T, Wei H, Zhang H, Chen S, Pan Y, Qiao A.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun 05; 220():106811. PubMed ID: 35447428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Wall Shear Stress Directional Abnormalities in BAV Aortas: Toward a New Hemodynamic Predictor of Aortopathy?
    Liu J, Shar JA, Sucosky P.
    Front Physiol; 2018 Jun 05; 9():993. PubMed ID: 30154723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of bicuspid valve geometry on ascending aortic fluid dynamics: a parametric study.
    Vergara C, Viscardi F, Antiga L, Luciani GB.
    Artif Organs; 2012 Apr 05; 36(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 21995712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.