These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
385 related items for PubMed ID: 22296616
1. The prospective evaluation of safety and success of a new method of introducing percutaneous paddle leads and complex arrays with an epidural access system. Deer T, Bowman R, Schocket SM, Kim C, Ranson M, Amirdelfan K, Raso L. Neuromodulation; 2012; 15(1):21-9; discussion 29-30. PubMed ID: 22296616 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Technological innovation in spinal cord stimulation: use of a newly developed delivery device for introduction of spinal cord stimulation leads. Logé D, De Coster O, Washburn S. Neuromodulation; 2012 Jul; 15(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 22672129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a newly developed delivery device for percutaneous introduction of multiple lead configurations for spinal cord stimulation. Raso LJ, Deer TR, Schocket SM, Chapman JA, Duarte LE, Justiz R, Amirdelfan K, Paicius RM, Navalgund YA, Girardi GE, Coleman NE, Verdolin M, Haider N, Rosen S, Netherton MD, Owens MC, Bennett MT, Rosenberg J, Jackson S, Nelson CL, Davis TT. Neuromodulation; 2014 Jul; 17(5):465-71; discussion 471. PubMed ID: 24612234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous implanted paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. Kinfe TM, Schu S, Quack FJ, Wille C, Vesper J. Neuromodulation; 2012 Jul; 15(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 22672364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs. Babu R, Hazzard MA, Huang KT, Ugiliweneza B, Patil CG, Boakye M, Lad SP. Neuromodulation; 2013 Jul; 16(5):418-26; discussion 426-7. PubMed ID: 23647789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel percutaneous technique to implant plate-type electrodes. Logé D, De Coster O, Pollet W, Vancamp T. Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):219-22. PubMed ID: 22278783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative approach to needle placement in spinal cord stimulator trial/implantation. Zhu J, Falco F, Onyewu CO, Joesphson Y, Vesga R, Jari R. Pain Physician; 2011 Oct; 14(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21267041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Shape Memory Nitinol Based Minimally Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation Device Concept for Improved Pain Management. Sampath SG, Telfeian AE, Sullivan R, Lu A, Srivastava V. Pain Physician; 2022 Mar; 25(2):E375-E383. PubMed ID: 35322993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of Skip Laminotomy for Placement of Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation. Harland TA, Staudt MD, Bandlamuri S, Juneja A, Pilitsis JG, Sukul VV. Neuromodulation; 2024 Jan; 27(1):183-187. PubMed ID: 37632516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads. Harland TA, Topp G, Shao K, Pilitsis JG. Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 35393239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New technique for open placement of paddle-type spinal cord stimulator electrode in presence of epidural scar tissue. Pabaney AH, Robin AM, Schwalb JM. Neuromodulation; 2014 Dec; 17(8):759-62; discussion 762. PubMed ID: 24725098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative Thoracic Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Should Such a Recommendation Be an Absolute Requirement? Best BJ, Porwal MH, Pahapill PA. Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):758-762. PubMed ID: 35803680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidural anesthesia for placement of spinal cord stimulators with paddle-type electrodes. Zhang K, Bhatia S, Oh M, Whiting D. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2009 Jul; 87(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 19590261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Localization of cervical and cervicomedullary stimulation leads for pain treatment using median nerve somatosensory evoked potential collision testing. Balzer JR, Tomycz ND, Crammond DJ, Habeych M, Thirumala PD, Urgo L, Moossy JJ. J Neurosurg; 2011 Jan; 114(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 20509731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rates of lead migration and stimulation loss in spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective comparison of laminotomy versus percutaneous implantation. Kim DD, Vakharyia R, Kroll HR, Shuster A. Pain Physician; 2011 Jan; 14(6):513-24. PubMed ID: 22086092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudomeningocele and percutaneous intrathecal lead placement complication for spinal cord stimulator. Patel A, Kafka B, Al Tamimi M. J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 59():347-349. PubMed ID: 30470653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of spinal canal diameter in the placement of thoracic spinal cord stimulator paddle leads. Ragel BT, Riedman T, McGehee M, Raslan AM. Pain Pract; 2024 Jan; 24(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 37626446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]