These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 22306698

  • 21. [Conjunctival impression cytology in patients with normal and impaired OSDI scores].
    Zuazo F, López-Ponce D, Salinas-Toro D, Valenzuela F, Sans-Puroja J, Srur M, López-Solís RO, Traipe-Castro L.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Oct; 89(10):391-6. PubMed ID: 24993073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reliability of nucleus-to-cell and nucleus-to-cytoplasm calculations for conjunctival impression cytology specimens.
    Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jul; 37(7):583-91. PubMed ID: 22574637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The influence of gender on the ocular surface.
    Connor CG, Flockencier LL, Hall CW.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1999 Mar; 70(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 10457693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Assessment of goblet cell orifice distribution across the rabbit bulbar conjunctiva based on numerical density and nearest neighbors analysis.
    Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 Feb; 38(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 23327688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Density and distribution of feline conjunctival goblet cells.
    Eördögh R, Jakab C, Papp R, Tichy A, Nell B.
    J Feline Med Surg; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1048-1054. PubMed ID: 27765834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology.
    Doughty MJ, Naase T.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Jun; 31(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 18258477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality.
    Lievens CW, Connor CG, Murphy H.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 14555901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A Grid-Based Nucleus Counting Method for Estimates of the Density of Superficial Conjunctival Cells from Impression Cytology Samples Taken from Normal Healthy Human Eyes.
    Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Sep; 42(9):1228-1234. PubMed ID: 28557568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology.
    Aragona P, Ferreri G, Micali A, Puzzolo D.
    Eye (Lond); 1998 Sep; 12 ( Pt 3a)():461-6. PubMed ID: 9775250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Objective assessment of contact lens wear-associated conjunctival squamous metaplasia by linear measures of cell size, shape and nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios.
    Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 Jul; 36(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 21599455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Research on effects of vitamin A palmitate on repair of mechanical corneal epithelial defects and conjunctival goblet cells in rabbits].
    Qiu XD, Gong L, Chen MJ.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 46(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 20388350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Further analysis of the size and shape of cells obtained by impression cytology from the exposed portion of the human bulbar conjunctiva.
    Doughty MJ, Blades K, Button NF, Wilson G.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Sep; 20(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 11045248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva in contact lens wear.
    Efron N, Al-Dossari M, Pritchard N.
    Cornea; 2010 Jan; 29(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 19907292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Conjunctival impression cytology changes induced by oral isotretinoin.
    de Queiroga IB, Antônio Vieira L, Barros Jde N, Melo Diniz Mde F, de Morais LC.
    Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):1009-13. PubMed ID: 19724211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of goblet cell density after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome in LASIK.
    Rodriguez AE, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Hamdi IM, Galal A, Awadalla M, Alio JL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2570-5. PubMed ID: 17525186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface.
    Cakmak SS, Unlü MK, Karaca C, Nergiz Y, Ipek S.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 14555898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers.
    Simon P, Jaison SG, Chopra SK, Jacob S.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 50(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 12532495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of grading schemes to quantitative assessments of nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratios for human bulbar conjunctival cells collected by impression cytology.
    Blades KJ, Doughty MJ.
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Apr; 20(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 10806448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Distribution of goblet cells and MUC5AC mRNA in the canine nictitating membrane.
    Umeda Y, Nakamura S, Fujiki K, Toshida H, Saito A, Murakami A.
    Exp Eye Res; 2010 Nov; 91(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 20804752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Density and distribution of canine conjunctival goblet cells.
    Moore CP, Wilsman NJ, Nordheim EV, Majors LJ, Collier LL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Dec; 28(12):1925-32. PubMed ID: 3679745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.