These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
195 related items for PubMed ID: 22309354
1. Optimizing pacemaker longevity with pacing mode and settings programming: results from a pacemaker multicenter registry. Benkemoun H, Sacrez J, Lagrange P, Amiel A, Prakash A, Himmrich E, Aimè E, Mairesse GH, Guénon C, Sbragia P. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 22309354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients. Davy JM, Hoffmann E, Frey A, Jocham K, Rossi S, Dupuis JM, Frabetti L, Ducloux P, Prades E, Jauvert G. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G, Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial. Stockburger M, Defaye P, Boveda S, Stancak B, Lazarus A, Sipötz J, Nardi S, Rolando M, Moreno J. Europace; 2016 May; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity. Schuchert A, Meinertz T, Low Output Programming (LOP) Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic and health consequences of managing bradycardia with dual-chamber compared to single-chamber ventricular pacemakers in Italy. Deniz HB, Caro JJ, Ward A, Moller J, Malik F. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 18268418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study. Veasey RA, Arya A, Silberbauer J, Sharma V, Lloyd GW, Patel NR, Sulke AN. Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experience with dual-chamber pacemakers at the Valencia General Hospital]. Aranda J, Ridocci F, Fernández A, Villalba S, Quesada A, Payá R, Giménez JV, Roda J, Dallí E, Pomar F. Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Jun; 43 Suppl 2():84-7. PubMed ID: 2236803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). Link MS, Hellkamp AS, Estes NA, Orav EJ, Ellenbogen KA, Ibrahim B, Greenspon A, Rizo-Patron C, Goldman L, Lee KL, Lamas GA, MOST Study Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun 02; 43(11):2066-71. PubMed ID: 15172414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]