These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1135 related items for PubMed ID: 22310806

  • 1. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K, Kim SJ, Moon J, Cho J.
    Water Res; 2012 Apr 15; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM, Yu MJ, Oh HK, Ylee YH.
    Water Res; 2003 Jul 15; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Understanding the fouling of UF/MF hollow fibres of biologically treated wastewaters using advanced EfOM characterization and statistical tools.
    Filloux E, Labanowski J, Croue JP.
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug 15; 118():460-8. PubMed ID: 22717564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR, Wilf M, Andes K, Iong J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Aug 15; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contribution of effluent organic matter (EfOM) to ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling: isolation, characterization, and fouling effect of EfOM fractions.
    Zheng X, Khan MT, Croué JP.
    Water Res; 2014 Nov 15; 65():414-24. PubMed ID: 25173435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of membrane fouling for in-line filtration of oil sands process-affected water: the effects of pretreatment conditions.
    Kim ES, Liu Y, Gamal El-Din M.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar 06; 46(5):2877-84. PubMed ID: 22279959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Combined influence of membrane surface properties and feed water qualities on RO/NF mass transfer, a pilot study.
    Zhao Y, Taylor J, Hong S.
    Water Res; 2005 Apr 06; 39(7):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15862323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Membrane filtration of wastewater effluents for reuse: effluent organic matter rejection and fouling.
    Jarusutthirak C, Amy G.
    Water Sci Technol; 2001 Apr 06; 43(10):225-32. PubMed ID: 11436785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, Amy G.
    Water Res; 2011 Dec 15; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M, Ates A, Inanc B.
    Water Sci Technol; 2002 Dec 15; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.