These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

300 related items for PubMed ID: 22314919

  • 1. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H, Angeli S, Telischi FF, Fabry D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of preoperative hearing-in-noise protocol for osseointegrated hearing implants.
    Whited CW, Unrein SC, Tucci DL, Kaylie DM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 23820797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bone-anchored implantation for single-sided deafness in patients with less than profound hearing loss.
    Zeitler DM, Snapp HA, Telischi FF, Angeli SI.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 22368043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP, Lowther R, Cooper H, Holder RL, Irving RM, Reid AP, Proops DW.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Yuen HW, Bodmer D, Smilsky K, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB, Wouters K, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Stieger C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Audiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implant.
    Sylvester DC, Gardner R, Reilly PG, Rankin K, Raine CH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):922-6. PubMed ID: 23370564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.