These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 22316007

  • 1. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S, Holube I, Schlueter A, Hansen M.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Moore BC, Füllgrabe C, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L, Claesson A, Persson M, Tengstrand T.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
    Mueller HG, Weber J, Bellanova M.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC, Wu YH, Hsiao SH, Zhang X.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D, Whitmer WM, Akeroyd MA.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb 01; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.