These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 22319766

  • 1. Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants.
    Zinelis S, Silikas N, Thomas A, Syres K, Eliades G.
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(1):72-92. PubMed ID: 22319766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Piattelli A, Coelho PG.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
    Juodzbalys G, Sapragoniene M, Wennerberg A, Baltrukonis T.
    J Oral Implantol; 2007 Oct; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of bioceramic powder abrasion on different implant surfaces.
    Abuhajar E, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N, Anweigi LM.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):60-69. PubMed ID: 38594924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In Vitro Bioactivity Test of Real Dental Implants According to ISO 23317.
    Kolafová M, Šťovíček J, Strnad J, Zemek J, Dybal J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Sep; 32(6):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 29140368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Effect of Microcosm Biofilm Decontamination on Surface Topography, Chemistry, and Biocompatibility Dynamics of Implant Titanium Surfaces.
    Sousa V, Mardas N, Spratt D, Hassan IA, Walters NJ, Beltrán V, Donos N.
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep 02; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography.
    Perrotti V, Aprile G, Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Sep 02; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants.
    Tabassum A, Walboomers F, Wolke JG, Meijer GJ, Jansen JA.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec 02; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.