These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
903 related items for PubMed ID: 22324297
1. Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation. Hsu HT, Chou SH, Wu PJ, Tseng KY, Kuo YW, Chou CY, Cheng KI. Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 22324297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial comparing the GlideScope(®) and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen endobronchial intubation. Russell T, Slinger P, Roscoe A, McRae K, Van Rensburg A. Anaesthesia; 2013 Dec; 68(12):1253-8. PubMed ID: 24219251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, Flynn NM, Laffey JG. Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation. Puchner W, Drabauer L, Kern K, Mayer C, Bierbaumer J, Rehak PH, Gombotz H. J Clin Anesth; 2011 Jun; 23(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21663811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios. Fonte M, Oulego-Erroz I, Nadkarni L, Sánchez-Santos L, Iglesias-Vásquez A, Rodríguez-Núñez A. Pediatr Emerg Care; 2011 May; 27(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 21494161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope compared to direct laryngoscopy. Ayoub CM, Kanazi GE, Al Alami A, Rameh C, El-Khatib MF. Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):674-8. PubMed ID: 20497150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]