These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 22328968

  • 21. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
    Khawaja RD, Singh S, Lira D, Bippus R, Do S, Padole A, Pourjabbar S, Koehler T, Shepard JA, Kalra MK.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M, Gyobu T, Leung AN, Kawai M, Kawata Y, Sumikawa H, Honda O, Tomiyama N.
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Image quality of mean temporal arterial and mean temporal portal venous phase images calculated from low dose dynamic volume perfusion CT datasets in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
    Wang X, Henzler T, Gawlitza J, Diehl S, Wilhelm T, Schoenberg SO, Jin ZY, Xue HD, Smakic A.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2104-2110. PubMed ID: 27776665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, Pien H, Hsieh J, Blake MA, Sahani DV.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A, Kim T, Hori M, Onishi H, Tsuboyama T, Sakane M, Tatsumi M, Tomiyama N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Saini A, Gervais DA, Westra SJ, Thrall JH.
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.