These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
325 related items for PubMed ID: 22329140
1. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal. Hidalgo AM, León G, Gómez M, Murcia MD, Gómez E, Gómez JL. Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Yüksel S, Kabay N, Yüksel M. J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec 15; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Xie M, Nghiem LD, Price WE, Elimelech M. Water Res; 2012 May 15; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. High-performance multi-functional reverse osmosis membranes obtained by carbon nanotube·polyamide nanocomposite. Inukai S, Cruz-Silva R, Ortiz-Medina J, Morelos-Gomez A, Takeuchi K, Hayashi T, Tanioka A, Araki T, Tejima S, Noguchi T, Terrones M, Endo M. Sci Rep; 2015 Sep 03; 5():13562. PubMed ID: 26333385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters. Yoon Y, Lueptow RM. Water Res; 2005 Sep 03; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide. Coronell O, Mi B, Mariñas BJ, Cahill DG. Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan 02; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes. Yoon J, Amy G, Chung J, Sohn J, Yoon Y. Chemosphere; 2009 Sep 02; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents. Turan M, Ates A, Inanc B. Water Sci Technol; 2002 Feb 02; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. Valladares Linares R, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Li Z, Amy G. Water Res; 2011 Dec 15; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Lin YL, Chiou JH, Lee CH. J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul 30; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance. Lind ML, Eumine Suk D, Nguyen TV, Hoek EM. Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov 01; 44(21):8230-5. PubMed ID: 20942398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]