These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

55 related items for PubMed ID: 22334598

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients.
    Saltzman CL, Rashid R, Hayes A, Fellner C, Fitzpatrick D, Klapach A, Frantz R, Hillis SL.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 15069135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of the monofilament with other testing modalities for foot ulcer susceptibility.
    Miranda-Palma B, Sosenko JM, Bowker JH, Mizel MS, Boulton AJ.
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 70(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 16126117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The clinical use of the 10g monofilament and its limitations: a review.
    Tan LS.
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 Oct; 90(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20655123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
    Baker N.
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations.
    Rinkel WD, van der Oest MJW, Dijkstra DA, Castro Cabezas M, Coert JH.
    Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3119. PubMed ID: 30575290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of different screening tests for detecting diabetic foot neuropathy.
    Forouzandeh F, Aziz Ahari A, Abolhasani F, Larijani B.
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2005 Dec; 112(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 16281925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 gram monofilament: the long and the short of it.
    McGill M, Molyneaux L, Yue DK.
    Diabet Med; 1998 Jul; 15(7):615-7. PubMed ID: 9686703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
    Kamei N, Yamane K, Nakanishi S, Yamashita Y, Tamura T, Ohshita K, Watanabe H, Fujikawa R, Okubo M, Kohno N.
    J Diabetes Complications; 2005 Jul; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15642490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vibration perception threshold: are multiple sites of testing superior to single site testing on diabetic foot examination?
    Armstrong DG, Hussain SK, Middleton J, Peters EJ, Wunderlich RP, Lavery LA.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 May; 44(5):70-4, 76. PubMed ID: 9697548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intravenous angiocatheters as a novel alternative to Semmes-Weinstein monofilament evaluation in testing protective sensation.
    Hire JM, Ramadorai UE, Contractor D, Jacobs JM, Bojescul JA, Abell BE.
    Mil Med; 2014 Apr; 179(4):442-4. PubMed ID: 24690970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
    Gin H, Rigalleau V, Baillet L, Rabemanantsoa C.
    Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Plantar pressure distribution in Type 2 diabetic patients without peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease.
    Pataky Z, Assal JP, Conne P, Vuagnat H, Golay A.
    Diabet Med; 2005 Jun; 22(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 15910629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Examination of tactile disorders in diabetic patients and cooperation with a neurologist].
    Jirkovská A, Boucek P.
    Vnitr Lek; 2007 May; 53(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17642430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screening for patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration in a general diabetic outpatient clinic.
    Klenerman L, McCabe C, Cogley D, Crerand S, Laing P, White M.
    Diabet Med; 1996 Jun; 13(6):561-3. PubMed ID: 8799661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Twelve steps per foot are recommended for valid and reliable in-shoe plantar pressure data in neuropathic diabetic patients wearing custom made footwear.
    Arts ML, Bus SA.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Oct; 26(8):880-4. PubMed ID: 21641098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance.
    Ahmed A, Chandra S, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Pickering BW.
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1626-34. PubMed ID: 21478739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 3.