These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 2234731

  • 21. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Atkinson BF.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Inflammatory atypia. An apparent link with subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia explained by cytologic underreading.
    Frisch LE.
    Acta Cytol; 1987 Oct; 31(6):869-72. PubMed ID: 3425146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF, Hernandez E, Anderson LL, Heller PB, Shank R.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP, Kaminsky DB, Ekbladh LE.
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO, Jelen I, Louis F, Kawada CY, Curry SL.
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO, Irwin JF, Carter TS, Kaufman RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Significance of anucleated squames in Papanicolaou-stained cervicovaginal smears.
    Kern SB.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Aug; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 1994643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Papanicolaou smear versus colposcopy for evaluation of the uterine cervix in women with perineal condyloma: a preliminary study.
    Shima LK.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1987 Oct; 87(10):674-6. PubMed ID: 3679906
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Necessity for endocervical curettage in elderly women undergoing colposcopy.
    Dinh TA, Dinh TV, Hannigan EV, Yandell RB, Dillard EA.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):621-4. PubMed ID: 2810244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.