These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
180 related items for PubMed ID: 22348018
1. How prevalent is object-based attention? Pilz KS, Roggeveen AB, Creighton SE, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB. PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30693. PubMed ID: 22348018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of object similarity and orientation on object-based cueing. Hein E, Blaschke S, Rolke B. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 27797008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in the temporal dynamics of object-based attentional selection. Lou H, Lorist MM, Pilz KS. PLoS One; 2023 Jan; 18(11):e0294252. PubMed ID: 37976325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Central-cue discriminability modulates object-based attention by influencing spatial attention. Goldsmith M, Yeari M. Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 22172980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of object-based attention in pigeons (Columba livia) and hill mynas (Gracula religiosa) using a spatial cueing task. Fujii K, Ushitani T. J Comp Psychol; 2020 Feb; 134(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 31318224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL, Humphreys GW. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention. Şentürk G, Greenberg AS, Liu T. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1998-2013. PubMed ID: 27225468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X, Humphreys G, Fan S, Chen L, Han S. Brain Res; 2008 Dec 15; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Object-based attention and visual area LO. de-Wit LH, Kentridge RW, Milner AD. Neuropsychologia; 2009 May 15; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Zellin M, Conci M, von Mühlenen A, Müller HJ. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct 15; 73(7):2065-76. PubMed ID: 21755420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lexical- and perceptual-based object effects in the two-rectangle cueing paradigm. Liu D, Wang Y, Zhou X. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov 15; 138(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 21981900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating location-based and object-based cue validity effects in object-based attention. Chou WL, Yeh SL. Vision Res; 2018 Feb 15; 143():34-41. PubMed ID: 29273205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Target frequency modulates object-based attention. Nah JC, Shomstein S. Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct 15; 27(5):981-989. PubMed ID: 32495212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: analysing the "locus" of the modulation. Luo C, Lupiáñez J, Funes MJ, Fu X. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec 15; 64(12):2455-69. PubMed ID: 21923623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Object-based attention in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Ushitani T, Imura T, Tomonaga M. Vision Res; 2010 Mar 17; 50(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 20064543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]