These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 22352745

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L, Ofner S, Stögermüller B, Ziegler B, Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube.
    Ismail SA, Bisher NA, Kandil HW, Mowafi HA, Atawia HA.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jun; 28(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 21455075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
    Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K.
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The effect of I-gel ™ airway on intraocular pressure in pediatric patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane during strabismus surgery.
    Sahin A, Tüfek A, Cingü AK, Caça I, Tokgöz O, Balsak S.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):772-5. PubMed ID: 22494062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, Langen KE, Mandler T.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sommers K, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Miller S, Voronov P, Seraphin S.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23189931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation.
    Noor Zairul M, Khairul Faizi A.
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Oct; 47(10):892-6. PubMed ID: 16990966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through i-gel® and LMA® ProtectorTM supraglottic airway devices - a randomised comparison.
    Mendonca C, Tourville CC, Jefferson H, Nowicka A, Patteril M, Athanassoglou V.
    Anaesthesia; 2019 Feb; 74(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 30467827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.
    Atef HM, Helmy AM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM.
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 23327031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults.
    Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients.
    Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 19735404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients.
    Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL.
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The distance between the glottis and the cuff of a tracheal tube placed through three supraglottic airway devices in children: A randomised controlled trial.
    Lee JH, Park S, Jang YE, Kim EH, Kim HS, Kim JT.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Oct; 36(10):721-727. PubMed ID: 31415305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A randomized trial comparing the Ambu ® Aura-i ™ with the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Roth AG, Suresh S.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 22(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 22971118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach™) and the Air-Q™.
    Karim YM, Swanson DE.
    Anaesthesia; 2011 Mar; 66(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 21320087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.