These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
331 related items for PubMed ID: 22358378
1. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, Roggendorf MJ. Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A, Frankenberger R. J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Rechenberg DK, Göhring TN, Attin T. J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. J Adhes Dent; 2003 Jun; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M. Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, Krastl G. Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25248949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E. Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Pelka M, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Oct; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent. Manso AG, González-Lopez S, Bolaños-Carmona V, Maurício PJ, Félix SA, Carvalho PA. J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]