These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 22361320

  • 1. A comparison between the first-fit settings of two multichannel digital signal-processing strategies: music quality ratings and speech-in-noise scores.
    Higgins P, Searchfield G, Coad G.
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 21(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22361320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC, Sęk A.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jun; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA, Cox RM, Alexander GC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology.
    Iwaki T, Blamey P, Kubo T.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):311-8. PubMed ID: 18569103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N, Frölich T, Kompis M, Bögli H, Lai WK.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Jun; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Apr; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.