These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 22367094

  • 1. Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.
    Bennett KO, Billings CJ, Molis MR, Leek MR.
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22367094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK, Zhang Y, Nelson PB, Wang B, Zou H.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA, Bidelman GM.
    Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2021 May 15; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May 15; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr 15; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 15; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Informational Masking Effects of Speech Versus Nonspeech Noise on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Vander Werff KR, Niemczak CE, Morse K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct 04; 64(10):4014-4029. PubMed ID: 34464537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/.
    Whiting KA, Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun 04; 19(3):218-31. PubMed ID: 9657596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Neural encoding for spatial release from informational masking and its correlation with behavioral metrics.
    Li JY, Wang X, Nie S, Zhu MY, Liu JX, Wei L, Li H, Wang NY, Zhang J.
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Oct 01; 132(4):1265-1277. PubMed ID: 39258777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Oct 01; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA, Sharma M, Bradford M, Mandikal Vasuki PR.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct 01; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm.
    Billings CJ, Bennett KO, Molis MR, Leek MR.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb 01; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 20890206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. On cross-language consonant identification in second language noise.
    Marchegiani L, Fafoutis X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct 01; 138(4):2206-9. PubMed ID: 26520302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA, Stefl AA, Gallun FJ, Billings CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Oct 01; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Oct 01; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct 01; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.
    Myerson J, Spehar B, Tye-Murray N, Van Engen K, Hale S, Sommers MS.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan 01; 78(1):346-54. PubMed ID: 26474981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.