These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
364 related items for PubMed ID: 22373932
1. Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation. Ito Z, Higashino K, Kato S, Kim SS, Wong E, Yoshioka K, Hutton WC. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22373932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique. Maki S, Aramomi M, Matsuura Y, Furuya T, Ota M, Iijima Y, Saito J, Suzuki T, Mannoji C, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Koda M. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Kothe R, Rüther W, Schneider E, Linke B. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep 01; 29(17):1869-75. PubMed ID: 15534407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Marcu D. Spine J; 2006 Sep 01; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws. Liu GY, Xu RM, Ma WH, Sun SH, Huang L, Ying JW, Jiang WY. Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug 05; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C, Hutton WC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov 01; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]