These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 22391118

  • 1. Which cue to 'want'? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking.
    DiFeliceantonio AG, Berridge KC.
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 May 01; 230(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 22391118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dorsolateral neostriatum contribution to incentive salience: opioid or dopamine stimulation makes one reward cue more motivationally attractive than another.
    DiFeliceantonio AG, Berridge KC.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 May 01; 43(9):1203-18. PubMed ID: 26924040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue.
    Mahler SV, Berridge KC.
    J Neurosci; 2009 May 20; 29(20):6500-13. PubMed ID: 19458221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue-triggered 'wanting' for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement.
    Peciña S, Berridge KC.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 May 20; 37(9):1529-40. PubMed ID: 23495790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex.
    Mahler SV, Berridge KC.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Jun 20; 221(3):407-26. PubMed ID: 22167254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.
    Yager LM, Robinson TE.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Sep 20; 232(17):3149-60. PubMed ID: 25980485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping.
    Iglesias AG, Chiu AS, Wong J, Campus P, Li F, Liu ZN, Bhatti JK, Patel SA, Deisseroth K, Akil H, Burgess CR, Flagel SB.
    J Neurosci; 2023 Nov 01; 43(44):7376-7392. PubMed ID: 37709540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue.
    Ahrens AM, Ferguson LM, Robinson TE, Aldridge JW.
    eNeuro; 2018 Nov 01; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29740595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus differentially affect sign- and goal-tracking conditioned responses.
    Haight JL, Fraser KM, Akil H, Flagel SB.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct 01; 42(7):2478-88. PubMed ID: 26228683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Examining the role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in Pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.
    Fraser KM, Haight JL, Gardner EL, Flagel SB.
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 May 15; 305():87-99. PubMed ID: 26909847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Subanesthetic ketamine decreases the incentive-motivational value of reward-related cues.
    Fitzpatrick CJ, Morrow JD.
    J Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jan 15; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 27649773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.
    Tripi JA, Dent ML, Meyer PJ.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Feb 15; 234(3):437-446. PubMed ID: 27837333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol.
    Versaggi CL, King CP, Meyer PJ.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Aug 15; 233(15-16):2985-97. PubMed ID: 27282365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of corticosterone on the acquisition of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in rats is dependent on sex and vendor.
    Turfe A, Westbrook SR, Lopez SA, Chang SE, Flagel SB.
    Horm Behav; 2024 Aug 15; 164():105609. PubMed ID: 39083878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.
    Flagel SB, Akil H, Robinson TE.
    Neuropharmacology; 2009 Aug 15; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):139-48. PubMed ID: 18619474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.
    Robinson MJ, Anselme P, Fischer AM, Berridge KC.
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun 01; 266():119-30. PubMed ID: 24631397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Neurons of the Ventral Tegmental Area Encode Individual Differences in Motivational "Wanting" for Reward Cues.
    Ferguson LM, Ahrens AM, Longyear LG, Aldridge JW.
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov 11; 40(46):8951-8963. PubMed ID: 33046552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Neural Activity in the Ventral Pallidum Encodes Variation in the Incentive Value of a Reward Cue.
    Ahrens AM, Meyer PJ, Ferguson LM, Robinson TE, Aldridge JW.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jul 27; 36(30):7957-70. PubMed ID: 27466340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Individual variation in the motivational and neurobiological effects of an opioid cue.
    Yager LM, Pitchers KK, Flagel SB, Robinson TE.
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2015 Mar 13; 40(5):1269-77. PubMed ID: 25425322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues.
    Yager LM, Robinson TE.
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec 06; 214(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 20416342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.