These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
304 related items for PubMed ID: 22402015
1. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders. O'Beirne GA, McGaffin AJ, Rickard NA. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 22402015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of auditory processing disorder in children using an adaptive filtered speech test. Rickard NA, Heidtke UJ, O'Beirne GA. Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):687-97. PubMed ID: 23879742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P. Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Snik AF, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise: finding the underlying origin. Lagacé J, Jutras B, Gagné JP. Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20308289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichotic listening performance in young adults using low-pass filtered speech. Martin JS, Gibson KY, Huston LC. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 22436117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) performance of individuals with central auditory processing disorders from 5 to 25 years of age. Dias KZ, Jutras B, Acrani IO, Pereira LD. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22192900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow. Gray L, Kesser B, Cole E. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Golding M, Taylor A, Cupples L, Mitchell P. Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 16518141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Simpson A, McDermott HJ, Dowell RC. Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]