These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 22420392

  • 1. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J, Ostevik A, Hodgetts B, Ho A.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT, Hildreth AJ, Lindsey L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E, Keidser G, Seeto M, Freeston K, Zhou D, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Oct; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
    Sadeghi AM, Flynn M, Davison T, Schulte M, Hillbratt M.
    B-ENT; 2016 Mar; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Motakef S, Upson GS.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG, Miyamoto RT.
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
    Margolis RH, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F, Swanepoel de W, Hall JW.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM, Sim JH, Xie YZ, Chatzimichalis M, Ullrich O, Röösli C.
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Stieger C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Biagio L.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W, Mngemane S, Molemong S, Mkwanazi H, Tutshini S.
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bone conduction implants for amplification: comparison of results.
    Hough DA, Matthews P, Hough JV.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Dec; 76(12):857, 861-2, 864-5. PubMed ID: 9431774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.