These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

352 related items for PubMed ID: 22424580

  • 1. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I, Dato I, Todaro D, Calabrese M, Rigattieri S, Leone AM, Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Trani C, Crea F.
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun 01; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
    Kan J, Gao X, Sandeep KG, Xu H, Zhao Y, Chen S, Chen F.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014 Jun 01; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessing intermediate coronary lesions: angiographic prediction of lesion severity on intravascular ultrasound.
    Fernandes MR, Silva GV, Caixeta A, Rati M, de Sousa e Silva NA, Perin EC.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Oct 01; 19(10):412-6. PubMed ID: 17906342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ, Zhu H, Shi SY, Muramatsu T, Pan DR, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Tian NL, Bourantas CV, Chen SL.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar 01; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB, Rubinshtein R, Psaltis PJ, Sandhu GS, Lennon R, Rihal CS, Lerman A.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun 01; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound.
    Sano K, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, de Ribamar Costa J, Qian J, Missel E, Shan S, Franklin-Bond T, Boland P, Weisz G, Moussa I, Dangas GD, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Kreps EM, Collins MB, Stone GW, Leon MB, Moses JW.
    Am Heart J; 2007 Nov 01; 154(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17967608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Correlation between 3D-QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses.
    Tomaniak M, Masdjedi K, van Zandvoort LJ, Neleman T, Tovar Forero MN, Vermaire A, Kochman J, Kardys I, den Dekker W, Wilschut J, Diletti R, de Jaegere P, Van Mieghem NM, Zijlstra F, Daemen J.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar 01; 97(4):E495-E501. PubMed ID: 32725862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
    Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Deksissa T, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012 Mar 01; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G, Cui K, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug 01; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Coronary CT angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for estimation of coronary stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden: a meta-analysis.
    Fischer C, Hulten E, Belur P, Smith R, Voros S, Villines TC.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013 Aug 01; 7(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 24148779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography.
    Feuchtner G, Loureiro R, Bezerra H, Rocha-Filho JA, Sarwar A, Pflederer T, Marwan M, Petranovic M, Raffel CO, Brady TB, Jang IK, Achenbach S, Cury RC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan 01; 81(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 21227613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Zasada W, Slezak M, Pociask E, Malinowski KP, Proniewska K, Buszman P, Milewski K, Granada JF, Kaluza GL.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb 01; 35(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30796556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Limitations of intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of coronary luminal area--comparison with quantitative angiography.
    Iwami T, Fujii T, Miura T, Otani N, Matsuzaki M.
    Jpn Circ J; 1996 Aug 01; 60(8):575-84. PubMed ID: 8889660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.