These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

250 related items for PubMed ID: 22430701

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A, Dixit S, Hoshing C, Raikar SP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov 01; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K, Davids A, Range U, Richter G, Boening K, Reitemeier B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr 01; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, Eick JD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May 01; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH, Nemetz H, Nguyen LT, Contino R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul 01; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun 01; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, Mancl L, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug 01; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
    Nissan J, Rosner O, Bukhari MA, Ghelfan O, Pilo R.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013 Aug 01; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr 01; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
    Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug 01; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
    Varvara G, Murmura G, Sinjari B, Cardelli P, Caputi S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb 01; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1991 Oct 01; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH, Li T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun 01; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
    Wassell RW, Ibbetson RJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun 01; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S, Kumar S, Jain S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug 01; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F, Takahashi J.
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar 01; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings.
    Gelbard S, Aoskar Y, Zalkind M, Stern N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan 01; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.