These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


404 related items for PubMed ID: 22430854

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Agricultural biotechnology and the UK public.
    Moses V.
    Trends Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):402-4. PubMed ID: 12175772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S, McHughen A.
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Barriers and paths to market for genetically engineered crops.
    Rommens CM.
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2010 Feb; 8(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 19968823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. European disarray on transgenic crops.
    Abbott A.
    Nature; 2009 Feb 19; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. No country for new seeds: food and environmental security implications of Mexico's intended ban on GM crops.
    de la Barrera E, Aguirre-Pérez IA, Ibarra-Otero BA, Villalvazo-Figueroa EA, Díaz-Álvarez EA.
    Transgenic Res; 2020 Feb 19; 29(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 31912406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech.
    Miller HI.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep 19; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
    Craddock N.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr 19; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Food: Inside the hothouses of industry.
    Gilbert N.
    Nature; 2010 Jul 29; 466(7306):548-51. PubMed ID: 20671688
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Transgenic harvest.
    Nature; 2010 Oct 07; 467(7316):633-4. PubMed ID: 20930796
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
    Devos Y, Demont M, Sanvido O.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov 07; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Biotech firms join charities in drive to help Africa's farms.
    Hoag H.
    Nature; 2003 Mar 20; 422(6929):246. PubMed ID: 12646881
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Room for growth.
    Nature; 2014 Dec 11; 516(7530):143. PubMed ID: 25503196
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.
    Apel A.
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov 30; 27(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 20472105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
    Shand H.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug 30; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Bogged down in CAP reform.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug 30; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147983
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Putting Cartagena into practice.
    Watanabe KN, Taeb M, Okusu H.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct 30; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Fears over Europe's GM crop plan.
    Chipman A.
    Nature; 2010 Jul 29; 466(7306):542-3. PubMed ID: 20671684
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. India eases stance on GM crop trials.
    Kumar S.
    Nature; 2015 May 14; 521(7551):138-9. PubMed ID: 25971488
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.