These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 22437673

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
    Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, Gimenes-Sakima PP, Marcantonio E.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A, Heasman PA, Kelly PJ.
    J Dent; 1996 Jun; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
    Maritato M, Orazi L, Laurito D, Formisano G, Serra E, Lollobrigida M, Molinari A, De Biase A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D, Martins O, Matos S, Lopes P, Rolo T, Baptista I.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of various ultrasonic and hand instruments on the root surfaces of human single rooted teeth: A Planimetric and Profilometric study.
    Mittal A, Nichani AS, Venugopal R, Rajani V.
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2014 May; 18(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 25624626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E, Dominici F, Gokbuget AY, Cintan S, Guida L, Aydin MS, Mariotti A, Pilloni A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Root surface changes following manual and ultrasonic instrumentation - a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Wasti J, Ravishankar PL, Wasti A, Rajula MPB, Sunanda K, Alzahrani KJ, Alharif KF, Halawani IF, Alzahrani FM, Baeshen HA, Abulhamael AM, Patil S.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jun; 27(12):5415-5420. PubMed ID: 37401276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the effects of periodontal rotary instruments and Gracey curettes on root surface characteristics: an in vivo SEM study.
    Dwivedi S, Verma SJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Jun; 43(10):e135-40. PubMed ID: 23115772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR, O'Leary TJ, Blumenshine RV.
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative SEM study between hand instrument and Er:YAG laser scaling and root planing.
    Moghare Abed A, Tawakkoli M, Dehchenari MA, Gutknecht N, Mir M.
    Lasers Med Sci; 2007 Mar; 22(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17115236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.