These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


258 related items for PubMed ID: 2243948

  • 1. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations.
    Brackett WW, Robinson PB.
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of the XR-bonding system on in vitro caries.
    Swift EJ, Linden JJ, Wefel JS.
    Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):157-61. PubMed ID: 1930838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Aug; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM, Jenson ME, Doering JV, Sheth JJ.
    Gen Dent; 1989 Aug; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel.
    Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries.
    Swift EJ, Bader JD, Shugars DA.
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 10332370
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal gap formation in the composite resin/glass ionomer cement Class V restoration.
    Phair CB, Zidan O, Gomez-Martin O, Han S.
    Dent Mater; 1988 Jun; 4(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 3077378
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S, Mante MO, Mante FK.
    J Clin Dent; 1996 Jun; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA, Araújo RM, Marsilio AL.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE, Chan GP, Yim D.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Feb; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.