These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

265 related items for PubMed ID: 22458628

  • 1. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Validity of digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant bone defects: in vitro study].
    Elera Morales CC, Castro Ruiz CT.
    Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2023 Jun; 11(1):e141. PubMed ID: 38288316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T, Juerchott A, Deisenhofer UK, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Schwindling FS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Pinheiro LR, Gaia BF, Oliveira de Sales MA, Umetsubo OS, Santos Junior O, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
    Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, de Oliveira Sales MA, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Jul; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study.
    Pelekos G, Tse JMN, Ho D, Tonetti MS.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 31536645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.
    Bohner LOL, Mukai E, Oderich E, Porporatti AL, Pacheco-Pereira C, Tortamano P, De Luca Canto G.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Oct; 124(4):432-440.e5. PubMed ID: 28743664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V, Krcmaric Z, Schmidlin PR, Sahrmann P, Wiedemeier DB, Benic GI.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth.
    Brady E, Mannocci F, Brown J, Wilson R, Patel S.
    Int Endod J; 2014 Aug; 47(8):735-46. PubMed ID: 24182358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Is cone beam computed tomography accurate for postoperative evaluation of implants? An in vitro study.
    Vidor MM, Liedke GS, Fontana MP, da Silveira HLD, Arus NA, Lemos A, Vizzotto MB.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Nov; 124(5):500-505. PubMed ID: 28867464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F.
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of crestal radiolucencies around dental implants: an in vitro experimental study.
    Sirin Y, Horasan S, Yaman D, Basegmez C, Tanyel C, Aral A, Guven K.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1540-50. PubMed ID: 22698290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.
    Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, Augusto de Oliveira Sales M, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, Cavalcanti MG.
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 26156676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of peri-implant fenestration.
    Gholampour A, Mollaei M, Ehsani H, Ghobadi F, Hosseinnataj A, Yazdani M.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug 09; 24(1):922. PubMed ID: 39123157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.
    Silveira-Neto N, Flores ME, De Carli JP, Costa MD, Matos FS, Paranhos LR, Linden MSS.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Nov 09; 72(11):708-713. PubMed ID: 29236918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
    Schwindling FS, Hilgenfeld T, Weber D, Kosinski MA, Rammelsberg P, Tasaka A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec 09; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Razavi T, Palmer RM, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul 09; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level.
    de Azevedo Vaz SL, Neves FS, Figueirêdo EP, Haiter-Neto F, Campos PS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct 09; 24(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 22762154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.