These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 22471544

  • 1. A defence of the requirement to seek consent to withhold and withdraw futile treatments.
    Stewart CL.
    Med J Aust; 2012 Apr 02; 196(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 22471544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Autonomy versus futility? Barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: a Queensland case.
    Lawrence S, Willmott L, Milligan E, Winch S, White B, Parker M.
    Med J Aust; 2012 Apr 02; 196(6):404-5. PubMed ID: 22471543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Discontinuation of futile therapy].
    Bülow HH, Hartling OJ.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb 19; 169(8):717-9. PubMed ID: 17313925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
    Pedersen R, Bahus MK, Kvisle EM.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun 14; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent.
    Gedge E, Giacomini M, Cook D.
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Apr 14; 33(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 17400619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.
    Downie J.
    J Palliat Care; 2004 Apr 14; 20(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 15511032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rituals, death and the moral practice of medical futility.
    Mohammed S, Peter E.
    Nurs Ethics; 2009 May 14; 16(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 19372124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. End-of-life decisions for extremely low-gestational-age infants: why simple rules for complicated decisions should be avoided.
    Dupont-Thibodeau A, Barrington KJ, Farlow B, Janvier A.
    Semin Perinatol; 2014 Feb 14; 38(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24468567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. DNR and ECMO: a paradox worth exploring.
    Meltzer EC, Ivascu NS, Fins JJ.
    J Clin Ethics; 2014 Feb 14; 25(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24779313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 14; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Medical futility procedures: what more do we need to know?
    Rubin E, Courtwright A.
    Chest; 2013 Nov 14; 144(5):1707-1711. PubMed ID: 24189864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The problem with home remedies: Manitoba, doctors and unilateral decisions in end-of-life care.
    Murphy P, Webster GC, Chaze B.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar 14; 10(3):71-3. PubMed ID: 20229431
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Just dying: the futility of futility.
    Savulescu J.
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Sep 14; 39(9):583-4. PubMed ID: 22893528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.