These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

464 related items for PubMed ID: 2248234

  • 21. Simultaneous use of cervical appliance and activator: an orthopedic approach to fixed appliance therapy.
    Pfeiffer JP, Grobety D.
    Am J Orthod; 1972 Apr; 61(4):353-73. PubMed ID: 4501983
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Kerr WJ, Buchanan IB, McColl JH.
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 8286305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Conservative management of malocclusion in mixed dentition.
    Sharma A, Kaur G, Gera A, Goyal S.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2000 Sep; 18(3):103-7. PubMed ID: 11324198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Nonsurgical treatment of an adult patient with bilateral posterior crossbite.
    Liu R, Xiaoqing M, Wamalwa P, Zou SJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 21724094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The contemporary use of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Ward S, Read MJ.
    Dent Update; 2004 May; 31(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 15188527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The versatile hinge appliance.
    Ellingson BH.
    J Clin Orthod; 1996 Jan; 30(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 9063166
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Treatment of open bite by means of detachable and fixed orthodontic appliances].
    Jez M.
    Zobozdrav Vestn; 1974 Jan; 29(6):189-94. PubMed ID: 4535548
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index.
    Gu J, Tang JS, Skulski B, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Kim DG, Deguchi T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 28153154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R.
    Mondo Ortod; 1990 Feb; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Correction of anterior and lateral crossbite by a removable/fixed appliance combination.
    Clark WJ.
    Br J Orthod; 1980 Apr; 7(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 6932973
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Spahl split vertical appliance.
    Spahl TJ.
    Funct Orthod; 1992 Apr; 9(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 1452049
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.
    Borda AF, Garfinkle JS, Covell DA, Wang M, Doyle L, Sedgley CM.
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul 01; 90(4):485-490. PubMed ID: 33378505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Dentofacial orthopedics, fixed and removable. Current trends].
    Pfeiffer JP.
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1975 Mar 01; 85(3):314-27. PubMed ID: 1055465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. 1. Case assessment.
    Rock WP.
    Br Dent J; 1990 Feb 24; 168(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 2310637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment.
    John W, Kerr S, Buchanan IB, McNair FI, McColl JH.
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Jun 24; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 8062858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.