These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 22508023

  • 1. Assessment of the malnutrition related information on the internet.
    Dash NR, Pipal K, Kaza SK, Panigrahi P, Joshi A.
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 22508023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quality of nutrition related information on the internet for osteoporosis patients: a critical review.
    Joshi MP, Bhangoo RS, Kumar K.
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22129940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of web-based information on bunions.
    Chong YM, Fraval A, Chandrananth J, Plunkett V, Tran P.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 23478888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information.
    Magunacelaya MB, Glendor U.
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-43. PubMed ID: 21635690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.
    Rao NR, Mohapatra M, Mishra S, Joshi A.
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2012 Oct; 9(Summer):1c. PubMed ID: 22783151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of metabolic syndrome related health information on internet in Indian context.
    Joshi A, Mehta S, Talati K, Malhotra B, Grover A.
    Technol Health Care; 2013 Oct; 21(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 23358056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M, Freutel M, Seitz A, Steiner M, Wehrle E, Wilke HJ.
    Technol Health Care; 2012 Oct; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 23187011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Modular semiquantitative quality assessment of ophthalmic health information on the internet--reproducibility and correlation between different assessment categories].
    Schalnus R, Meyer C, Hoppe T, Lüchtenberg M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Aug; 226(8):664-71. PubMed ID: 19548185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
    Yeung TM, Mortensen NJ.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the internet for health information.
    Hanif F, Read JC, Goodacre JA, Chaudhry A, Gibbs P.
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 19919300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.
    Ghobrial GM, Mehdi A, Maltenfort M, Sharan AD, Harrop JS.
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Mar; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 24529231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bailey MA, Coughlin PA, Sohrabi S, Griffin KJ, Rashid ST, Troxler MA, Scott DJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
    Grewal P, Alagaratnam S.
    Int J Surg; 2013 Jul; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM, Volsko TA.
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A methodology to analyze the quality of health information on the internet: the example of diabetic neuropathy.
    Chumber S, Huber J, Ghezzi P.
    Diabetes Educ; 2015 Feb; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 25480397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites.
    Griffiths KM, Tang TT, Hawking D, Christensen H.
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Dec 30; 7(5):e59. PubMed ID: 16403723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.
    Law MR, Mintzes B, Morgan SG.
    Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar 30; 45(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21343404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Glue ear: how good is the information on the World Wide Web?
    Ritchie L, Tornari C, Patel PM, Lakhani R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Feb 30; 130(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 26805389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Breast cancer information on the internet: analysis of accessibility and accuracy.
    Quinn EM, Corrigan MA, McHugh SM, Murphy D, O'Mullane J, Hill AD, Redmond HP.
    Breast; 2012 Aug 30; 21(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 22349349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of the Quality of Patient-Orientated Information on Surgery for Crohn's Disease on the Internet.
    Yeung TM, Sacchi M, Mortensen NJ, Spinelli A.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep 30; 58(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 26252847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.