These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 22519983

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.
    Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Pishchalnikov YA, Handa RK, Blomgren P, Willis LR, Williams JC, Lingeman JE, Gao S.
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 17922871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.
    Handa RK, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Liu Z, Lingeman JE, Evan AP.
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. PubMed ID: 22612388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Using 300 Pretreatment Shock Waves in a Voltage Ramping Protocol Can Significantly Reduce Tissue Injury During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Connors BA, Evan AP, Handa RK, Blomgren PM, Johnson CD, Liu Z, Lingeman JE.
    J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1004-8. PubMed ID: 27307070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
    Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE.
    BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. PubMed ID: 17550415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping.
    Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, Gao S.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 18680494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator "SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury.
    Leistner R, Wendt-Nordahl G, Grobholz R, Michel MS, Marlinghaus E, Köhrmann KU, Alken P, Häcker A.
    Urol Res; 2007 Aug; 35(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 17483935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors.
    Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC.
    BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1681-6. PubMed ID: 18710450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is newer always better? A comparative study of 3 lithotriptor generations.
    Gerber R, Studer UE, Danuser H.
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2013-6. PubMed ID: 15879807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Evan AP, Willis LR, McAteer JA, Bailey MR, Connors BA, Shao Y, Lingeman JE, Williams JC, Fineberg NS, Crum LA.
    J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1556-62. PubMed ID: 12352457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model.
    Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, Gao S, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE.
    BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):1004-8. PubMed ID: 19338532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prevention of lithotripsy-induced renal injury by pretreating kidneys with low-energy shock waves.
    Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA, Handa RK, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE.
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 16452495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Renal Protection Phenomenon Observed in a Porcine Model After Electromagnetic Lithotripsy Using a Treatment Pause.
    Connors BA, Gardner T, Liu Z, Lingeman JE, Williams JC.
    J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):682-686. PubMed ID: 33472540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors.
    Portis AJ, Yan Y, Pattaras JG, Andreoni C, Moore R, Clayman R.
    J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 12478102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.