These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1118 related items for PubMed ID: 22521705

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA, Maghaireh GA, Ghannam AS, Palamara JE.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME, Park SH.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Dec; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Micromechanical Intervention in Sandwich Restoration.
    Khan TN, Ali Abidi SY, Nawaz Khan KB, Ahmed S, Rehman Qazi FU, Saeed N.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):781-4. PubMed ID: 26577960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodontic access preparations.
    Kleitches AJ, Lemon RR, Jeansonne BG.
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9520778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Jan; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jan; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P, Knezevic A.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.