These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


951 related items for PubMed ID: 22531900

  • 1. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA.
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine J; 2005 Oct; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan 01; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation.
    Pimenta L, Turner A, Oliveira L, Marchi L, Cornwall B.
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Mar 01; 76(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 25545808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov 01; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
    Mageswaran P, Techy F, Colbrunn RW, Bonner TF, McLain RF.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep 01; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
    Golubovsky JL, Colbrunn RW, Klatte RS, Nagle TF, Briskin IN, Chakravarthy VB, Gillespie CM, Reith JD, Jasty N, Benzel EC, Steinmetz MP.
    Spine J; 2020 Apr 01; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.
    Spine J; 2006 Apr 01; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.
    Cai XY, Sun MS, Huang YP, Liu ZX, Liu CJ, Du CF, Yang Q.
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun 01; 12(3):917-930. PubMed ID: 32476282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB, Murovic JA, Cho BY, Lim TJ, Park J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun 01; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.
    Knapik GG, Mendel E, Marras WS.
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun 01; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S641-52. PubMed ID: 21445618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.