These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations. Alptekin T, Ozer F, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N, Blatz MB. Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls. de Morais PM, Rodrigues Júnior AL, Pimenta LA. Oper Dent; 1999 Aug; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC, Pimenta LA. Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method. Jawaed NU, Abidi SY, Qazi FU, Ahmed S. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite. Edgren BN, Denehy GE. Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of three cavity varnishes in reducing marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Ulukapi I, Lussi A, Stich H, Hotz P. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 1308785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]