These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

342 related items for PubMed ID: 22534086

  • 1. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
    Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, Ravi P, Friedman A, Sun M, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Jeong W, Mander N, Peabody JO, Karakiewicz PI, Harris M.
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V, Razmaria A, Antic T, Al-Ahmadie H, Zagaja G, Eggener S, Brendler C, Shalhav A.
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS, Kang DI, Kim JH, Joung JY, Yu J, Parihar JS, Salmasi AH, Horie S, Kim WJ, Yi Kim I.
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Goetzl MA, Krebill R, Griebling TL, Thrasher JB.
    Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
    Saether T, Sørlien LT, Viset T, Lydersen S, Angelsen A.
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008 Apr; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for pT3bN0M0 prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.
    Fairey AS, Daneshmand S, Skinner EC, Schuckman A, Cai J, Lieskovsky G.
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 32(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 24183191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Choe G, Lee SE.
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P, Ploumidis A, Nyberg T, Olsson M, Akre O, Haendler L, Egevad L, Nilsson A, Carlsson S, Jonsson M, Adding C, Hosseini A, Steineck G, Wiklund P.
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K, Li H, Yang Y, Ian LH, Pun WH, Ho SF.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
    Suh YS, Jang HJ, Song W, Lee HW, Kim HS, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM.
    Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R, Fashola Y, Scotland KB, Calvaresi AE, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD.
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr 08; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN, Nunez RN, Mmeje CO, Colby TV, Ferrigni RG, Humphreys MR, Andrews PE, Castle EP.
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec 08; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014 Dec 08; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.