These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

359 related items for PubMed ID: 22536824

  • 1. Gamete donors' motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study.
    Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Gejervall AL, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Sydsjö G.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):944-51. PubMed ID: 22536824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
    Isaksson S, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
    Pennings G, de Mouzon J, Shenfield F, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Ruiz A, Goossens V.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS, Sydsjö G, Bladh M, Lampic C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.
    Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Gejerwall AL, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Sydsjö G.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1049-56. PubMed ID: 23611727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Oocyte and sperm donors' opinions on the acceptable number of offspring.
    Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Svanberg AS.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):634-9. PubMed ID: 24815748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
    Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria.
    Flatscher-Thöni M, Böttcher B, Geser W, Lampe A, Werner-Felmayer G, Voithofer C, Schusterschitz C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Feb; 37(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 31916077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: a Danish questionnaire survey.
    Ernst E, Ingerslev HJ, Schou O, Stoltenberg M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Feb; 86(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 17364308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation.
    Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Nedstrand E, Svanberg AS.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec; 47(6):103417. PubMed ID: 37931369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G, Janson PO, Tägnfors U, Bergh C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors.
    Switzer GE, Myaskovsky L, Goycoolea JM, Dew MA, Confer DL, King R.
    Transplantation; 2003 May 15; 75(9):1517-23. PubMed ID: 12792507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
    Söderström-Anttila V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Poranen AK, Sälevaara M, Suikkari AM.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar 15; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
    Kenney NJ, McGowan ML.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb 15; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Personality characteristics in a Swedish national sample of identifiable oocyte donors.
    Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Brändström S, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Svanberg AS.
    BJOG; 2011 Aug 15; 118(9):1067-72. PubMed ID: 21481152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct 15; 27(10):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 22859508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices--5 years after the removal of donor anonymity.
    Shukla U, Deval B, Jansa Perez M, Hamoda H, Savvas M, Narvekar N.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar 15; 28(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 23315068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.