These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 22537032

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements.
    Brännström KJ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Olsen SØ.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24003981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials.
    Brännström KJ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Olsen SØ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 22023486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: a study across the U.S. and Taiwan.
    Ho HC, Wu YH, Hsiao SH, Stangl E, Lentz EJ, Bentler RA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 23153252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Snik AF, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ, Olsen SØ, Holm L, Kastberg T, Ibertsson T.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
    Chen J, Zhang H, Plyler PN, Cao W, Chen J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S, Holube I, Schlueter A, Hansen M.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E, Keidser G, Hartley D, Hickson L.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?
    Olsen SØ, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24219089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing.
    Nichols AC, Gordon-Hickey S.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 22229761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE, Estis JM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL, Edwards BW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.