These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

369 related items for PubMed ID: 22537033

  • 1. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S, Brand T, Zokoll MA, Castro FZ, Wardenga N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A, Prodi N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, Ozimek E, Boboshko M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C, Theo Goverts S, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A, Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, Löppönen H, Zokoll MA, Kollmeier B.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A, Brand T, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H, Xi X, Wong LLN, Hochmuth S, Warzybok A, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Sharvard Corpus: a phonemically-balanced Spanish sentence resource for audiology.
    Aubanel V, Lecumberri ML, Cooke M.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):633-8. PubMed ID: 24863133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA, Wagener KC, Brand T, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.
    Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Zokoll MA, Uslar V, Brand T, Wagener KC.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54 Suppl 2():3-16. PubMed ID: 26383182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.