These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 22551340

  • 21. Novel method for generating structure-based pharmacophores using energetic analysis.
    Salam NK, Nuti R, Sherman W.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2356-68. PubMed ID: 19761201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. On evaluating molecular-docking methods for pose prediction and enrichment factors.
    Chen H, Lyne PD, Giordanetto F, Lovell T, Li J.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Oct; 46(1):401-15. PubMed ID: 16426074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods.
    Lee HS, Choi J, Kufareva I, Abagyan R, Filikov A, Yang Y, Yoon S.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 18302357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
    Tan L, Geppert H, Sisay MT, Gütschow M, Bajorath J.
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
    Sastry GM, Dixon SL, Sherman W.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct 24; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. ReverseScreen3D: a structure-based ligand matching method to identify protein targets.
    Kinnings SL, Jackson RM.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Mar 28; 51(3):624-34. PubMed ID: 21361385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of ligand-based and receptor-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors for the CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors using 3D ligand shape matching and ligand-receptor docking.
    Pérez-Nueno VI, Ritchie DW, Rabal O, Pascual R, Borrell JI, Teixidó J.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar 28; 48(3):509-33. PubMed ID: 18298095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Improving virtual screening performance against conformational variations of receptors by shape matching with ligand binding pocket.
    Lee HS, Lee CS, Kim JS, Kim DH, Choe H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Nov 28; 49(11):2419-28. PubMed ID: 19852439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
    Zhang Q, Muegge I.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar 09; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.