These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


197 related items for PubMed ID: 22559377

  • 21. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD, Brown CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The role of first formant information in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
    Verschuur C, Boland C, Frost E, Constable J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4279-89. PubMed ID: 23742378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JG.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jun; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH, Donaldson GS, Kong YY.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jun; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T, Most T, Luntz M.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C, Galvin J, Fu QJ, Legris E, Marx M, Bakhos D.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB, Liepins R, Kaider A, Vyskocil E, Riss D, Arnoldner C.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jun; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
    Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Carlyon RP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X, Chang YP, Lin CY, Chang RY.
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():1-8. PubMed ID: 24576834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D, Magnusson L, Faulkner A, Jönsson R, Juul H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X, Nie K, Imennov NS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, Atlas LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY.
    PLoS One; 2012 Nov; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Rakszawski B, Wright R, Cadieux JH, Davidson LS, Brenner C.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.
    Sheffield SW, Gifford RH.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Feb; 19(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 24556850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE, Dawson PW, Arora K.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA, Poissant SF, Freyman RL, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.
    Luo X, Fu QJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3223-33. PubMed ID: 19425665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.