These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

222 related items for PubMed ID: 22569837

  • 1. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
    Hofmann M, Wouters J.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.
    Hofmann M, Wouters J.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 20033246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R, Deprez H, Hofmann M, Moonen M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2017 May; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.
    Gransier R, Carlyon RP, Wouters J.
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep 21; 10(1):15406. PubMed ID: 32958791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Independent component analysis for cochlear implant artifacts attenuation from electrically evoked auditory steady-state response measurements.
    Deprez H, Gransier R, Hofmann M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Moonen M.
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb 21; 15(1):016006. PubMed ID: 29211684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auditory steady-state response evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients.
    Ménard M, Gallego S, Truy E, Berger-Vachon C, Durrant JD, Collet L.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec 21; 43 Suppl 1():S39-43. PubMed ID: 15732381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of an artifact reduction strategy for electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses: Simulations and measurements.
    Bahmer A, Pieper S, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb 15; 296():57-68. PubMed ID: 29291927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Encoding of the amplitude modulation of pulsatile electrical stimulation in the feline cochlear nucleus by neurons in the inferior colliculus; effects of stimulus pulse rate.
    McCreery D, Han M, Pikov V, Yadav K, Pannu S.
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Oct 15; 10(5):056010. PubMed ID: 23928683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 15; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 15; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Oct 15; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO, Luo X.
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep 01; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Transient and steady state auditory responses with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Verhaert N, Hofmann M, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Sep 01; 36(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 25401379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct 01; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.