These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Han H, Lee J, Cho S, Kim J, Lee K, Choi WD. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Speech audiometry with logatomes]. Welge-Lüssen A, Hauser R, Erdmann J, Schwob C, Probst R. Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise. Lyregaard PE. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Feb; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users. Boleas-Aguirre MS, Bulnes Plano MD, de Erenchun Lasa IR, Ibáñez Beroiz B. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pure tone audiogram and speech audiometry in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Alcin B, Vatovec J, Zargi M. Pflugers Arch; 2000 Jun; 439(3 Suppl):R202-3. PubMed ID: 10653191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Hagerman B. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984 Jun; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptation of the STARR test for adult Italian population: A speech test for a realistic estimate in real-life listening conditions. Dincer D'Alessandro H, Ballantyne D, De Seta E, Musacchio A, Mancini P. Int J Audiol; 2016 Jun; 55(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 26795710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students. Borg E, Samuelsson E, Danermark B, Rönnberg J. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999 Jun; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Buss E, Hall JW, Grose JH. Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 15179115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing. Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T. Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of the residual hearing on the profound hearing-impaired children with the hearing aids and cochlear implants]. Luo R, Wang X, Sun C, Lan J. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(24):1123-5. PubMed ID: 21395181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners]. He LP. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Dec; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comb-filtered speech as a tool to demonstrate difficulties of speech perception and the importance of auditory training in cochlear implant users. Petrov SM, Pisareva NY. Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21756459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy. Hassan DM. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21047293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]