These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
134 related items for PubMed ID: 22606929
41. Variables affecting pure tone and speech audiometry in experimentally simulated hearing loss. Aplin DY, Kane JM. Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 4063558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice]. von Wedel H. HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry. Billings CJ, Penman TM, Ellis EM, Baltzell LS, McMillan GP. Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Very good performance with bimodal stimulation in a like-hybrid modality in a patient with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with low-frequencies preservation. Laria C, Auletta G, Riccardi P, Papa C, Malesci R, Franzé A, Marciano E. Am J Otolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 35(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 24119296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio. McShefferty D, Whitmer WM, Akeroyd MA. Trends Hear; 2016 Feb 01; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J. Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul 01; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons. Hällgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S. J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jul 01; 12(7):357-70. PubMed ID: 11500010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Speech audiometric outcome parameters in clinical trials on hearing improvement]. Müller J, Plontke SK, Rahne T. HNO; 2017 Mar 01; 65(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 27933349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Hearing in adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Harner SG. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981 Mar 01; 89(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 6787535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Speech audiometry in expert assessment of hearing impairment]. Batsoulis C, Lesinski-Schiedat A. HNO; 2017 Mar 01; 65(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27689228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]