These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


458 related items for PubMed ID: 22616930

  • 1. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite.
    Popoff DA, de Magalhães CS, de Freitas Oliveira W, Soares LA, de Almeida Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Moreira AN, Mjör IA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 25516879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Giráldez I, Ceballos L.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R, Boushell LW, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Chung Y, Swift EJ.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014 Dec; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Dec; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B, Fuentes MV, Ceballos L.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun 01; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR, Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B.
    Oper Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A three-year prospective randomized study of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems in class II restorations.
    Mahmoud SH, Ali AK, Hegazi HA.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 16(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 24779025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations.
    Efes BG, Yaman BC, Gurbuz O, Gumuştaş B.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb 01; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb 01; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH, Scatolin RS, Oliveira FG, Machado LS, Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP, de Oliveira FBS, Souza JGS, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, França FMG, Popoff DAV.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 01; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb 01; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 37(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21942235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Silva MA, Pleffken PR, Rangel PM, Fernandes VV, Di Nicoló R, Torres CR.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Feb 01; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G, Fernández E, Martín J, Arancibia C, Mjör IA, Gordan VV.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.