These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
100 related items for PubMed ID: 22627063
1. QSAR model for human pregnane X receptor (PXR) binding: screening of environmental chemicals and correlations with genotoxicity, endocrine disruption and teratogenicity. Dybdahl M, Nikolov NG, Wedebye EB, Jónsdóttir SÓ, Niemelä JR. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2012 Aug 01; 262(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 22627063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of in silico filters to predict activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR) by structurally diverse drug-like molecules. Matter H, Anger LT, Giegerich C, Güssregen S, Hessler G, Baringhaus KH. Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep 15; 20(18):5352-65. PubMed ID: 22560839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ligand- and structure-based pregnane X receptor models. Kortagere S, Krasowski MD, Ekins S. Methods Mol Biol; 2012 Sep 15; 929():359-75. PubMed ID: 23007437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening of 397 chemicals and development of a quantitative structure--activity relationship model for androgen receptor antagonism. Vinggaard AM, Niemelä J, Wedebye EB, Jensen GE. Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Apr 15; 21(4):813-23. PubMed ID: 18324785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of in vitro PXR-based assays and in silico modeling approaches for understanding the binding of a structurally diverse set of drugs to PXR. Xiao L, Nickbarg E, Wang W, Thomas A, Ziebell M, Prosise WW, Lesburg CA, Taremi SS, Gerlach VL, Le HV, Cheng KC. Biochem Pharmacol; 2011 Mar 01; 81(5):669-79. PubMed ID: 21145880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive models for identifying the binding activity of structurally diverse chemicals to human pregnane X receptor. Yin C, Yang X, Wei M, Liu H. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug 01; 24(24):20063-20071. PubMed ID: 28699014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of high-throughput pregnane X receptor (PXR) transactivation and binding assays. Zhu Z, Kim S, Chen T, Lin JH, Bell A, Bryson J, Dubaquie Y, Yan N, Yanchunas J, Xie D, Stoffel R, Sinz M, Dickinson K. J Biomol Screen; 2004 Sep 01; 9(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 15452340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico prediction of pregnane X receptor activators by machine learning approaches. Ung CY, Li H, Yap CW, Chen YZ. Mol Pharmacol; 2007 Jan 01; 71(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 17003167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural insights into the promiscuity and function of the human pregnane X receptor. Watkins RE, Noble SM, Redinbo MR. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2002 Jan 01; 5(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 11865669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor. Hong H, Fang H, Xie Q, Perkins R, Sheehan DM, Tong W. SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Jan 01; 14(5-6):373-88. PubMed ID: 14758981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PXR ligand classification model with SFED-weighted WHIM and CoMMA descriptors. Ma SL, Joung JY, Lee S, Cho KH, No KT. SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2012 Jul 01; 23(5-6):485-504. PubMed ID: 22591167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of amino acids in rat pregnane X receptor that determine species-specific activation. Tirona RG, Leake BF, Podust LM, Kim RB. Mol Pharmacol; 2004 Jan 01; 65(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 14722235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting Rat and Human Pregnane X Receptor Activators Using Bayesian Classification Models. AbdulHameed MD, Ippolito DL, Wallqvist A. Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Oct 17; 29(10):1729-1740. PubMed ID: 27603675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]